Building the Infrastructure to Integrate Social Care in a Safety Net Health System.

A recent National Academies report recommended that health systems invest in new infrastructure to integrate social and medical care. Although many health systems routinely screen patients for social concerns, few health systems achieve the recommended model of integration. In this critical case study in an urban safety net health system, we describe the human capital, operational redesign, and financial investment needed to implement the National Academy recommendations. Using data from this case study, we estimate that other health systems seeking to build and maintain this infrastructure would need to invest $1 million to $3 million per year. While health systems with robust existing resources may be able to bootstrap short-term funding to initiate this work, we conclude that long-term investments by insurers and other payers will be necessary for most health systems to achieve the recommended integration of medical and social care. Researchers seeking to test whether integrating social and medical care leads to better patient and population outcomes require access to health systems and communities who have already invested in this model infrastructure. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print April 4, 2024:e1-e7. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307602).

Trends in Encounters for Emergency Contraception in US Emergency Departments, 2006-2020.

This cross-sectional study of female emergency contraception users examines emergency contraception­related emergency department use disparities and associations with policy changes.

Cross-Cultural Mentorship in Military Family Medicine: Defining the Problem.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Mentorship is critical to physician recruitment, career development, and retention. Many underrepresented in medicine (URiM) physicians experience minority taxes that can undermine their professional objectives. Use of cross-cultural mentoring skills to navigate differences between non-URiM and URiM physicians can make mentorship relationships with URiM physicians more effective. This survey examined military family physician demographics and mentorship practices. METHODS: Design and Setting: Cross-sectional study using voluntary, anonymous data from the 2021 Uniformed Services Academy of Family Physicians (USAFP) Annual Meeting Omnibus Survey. STUDY POPULATION: USAFP Members attending 2021 Virtual Annual Meeting. INTERVENTION: None. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics and χ2 tests. RESULTS: The response rate to the omnibus survey was 52.9%, n=258. More than half of respondents did not have a URiM mentee and had not collaborated with a URiM colleague on a scholarly activity within the last 3 years. Only 54.7% of respondents could recognize and address minority taxes. URiM physicians were more likely to have a URiM mentee (65.4% vs 44.4%, P=.042) and to recognize and address minority taxes (84.6% vs 51.3%, P=.001). They also were more confident (84.6% vs 60.3%, P=.015) and more skilled in discussing racism (80.8% vs 58.2%, P=.026). CONCLUSIONS: Structured programs are needed to improve knowledge and skills to support cross-cultural mentorship. Additional studies are needed to further evaluate and identify implementation strategies.

Experience of stigma and harassment among respondents to the 2019 Canadian abortion provider survey.

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a national survey to assess the experiences of stigma and harassment among physicians and nurse practitioners providing abortions and abortion service administrators in Canada. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted an exploratory, cross-sectional, national, anonymized, online survey between July and December 2020. Subsections of the survey explored stigma and harassment experienced by respondents, including the 35-item Revised Abortion Providers Stigma Scale and open-ended responses. We analyzed the quantitative data to generate descriptive statistics and employed a reflexive thematic analysis to interpret open-ended responses. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-four participants started the stigma and harassment section of the survey. Among low-volume clinicians (<30 abortions/year, 60%, n = 180) 8% reported harassment; 21% among higher volume clinicians (≥30 abortions/year, 40%, n = 119) and 47% among administrators (n = 39), most commonly picketing. The mean stigma score was 67.8 (standard deviation 17.2; maximum score 175). Our qualitative analysis identified five themes characterizing perceptions of stigma and harassment: concerns related to harassment from picketing, protestors, and the public; wanting protestor "bubble zones"; aiming to be anonymous to avoid being a target; not providing an abortion service; but also witnessing a safe and positive practice environment. CONCLUSIONS: Being a low-volume clinician compared to higher volume clinician and administrator appears to be associated with less harassment. Clinicians providing abortion care in Canada reported mid-range abortion-related stigma scores, and expressed strong concerns that stigma interfered with their abortion provision. Our results indicate that further de-stigmatization and protection of abortion providers in Canada is needed through policy and practice interventions including bubble zones. IMPLICATIONS: While Canadian abortion care clinicians and administrators reported relatively low incidence of harassment, our results indicate that they are concerned about stigma and harassment. However, as this was an exploratory survey, these data may not be representative of all Canadian abortion providers. Our data identify a need to support abortion clinicians and to bolster protections for dedicated abortion services.

The Impact of New and Renewed Restrictive State Abortion Laws on Pregnancy-Capable People with Diabetes.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: When the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization in June 2022, the constitutional right to abortion was no longer protected by Roe v Wade. Fifteen states now have total or near-total bans on abortion care or no clinics providing abortion services. We review how these restrictions affect the medical care of people with pregestational diabetes. RECENT FINDINGS: Of the ten states with the highest percent of adult women living with diabetes, eight currently have complete or 6-week abortion bans. People with diabetes are at high risk of diabetes-related pregnancy complications and pregnancy-related diabetes complications and are disproportionately burdened by abortion bans. Abortion is an essential part of comprehensive, evidence-based diabetes care, yet no medical society has published guidelines on pregestational diabetes that explicitly discuss the importance and role of safe abortion care. Medical societies enacting standards for diabetes care and clinicians providing diabetes care must advocate for access to abortion to reduce pregnancy-related morbidity and mortality for pregnant people with diabetes.

Levonorgestrel 52-mg Intrauterine Device Efficacy and Safety After More Than 8 Years of Use.

FUNDING SOURCE: Medicines360. The Sponsor, Medicines360, designed the study and oversaw its conduct, including funding the trial and providing all study product free of charge to participants. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00995150.

Lung Cancer Screening and Stigma: Do Smoking-related Differences in Perceived Lung Cancer Stigma Emerge Prior to Diagnosis?

Background: Most lung cancer patients report experiencing stigma (i.e., devaluation based on one's lung cancer diagnosis), which is associated with adverse health outcomes. Lung cancer is stigmatized due to its robust association with smoking and the perception of the disease as self-inflicted. Purpose: Identifying sociodemographic and smoking-related correlates of perceived stigma among lung cancer screening-eligible adults (early in the cancer care trajectory) is needed to guide proactive psychosocial interventions to reduce stigma and improve health for patients newly diagnosed with lung cancer. Methods: A national sample of lung cancer screening-eligible adults (N = 515; 64.9% female) completed questionnaires on sociodemographic information, smoking-related characteristics, and perceived smoking-related lung cancer stigma. Zero-order and multivariate relationships between sociodemographic variables, smoking-related characteristics, and stigma were evaluated using Pearson's correlations, t-tests, ANOVAs, and multivariable regression. Results: The multivariable regression demonstrated that younger age (b = -0.05, p = .047) was associated significantly with higher stigma. Additionally, women (b = 0.63, p = .015), participants who reported Hispanic/Latino ethnicity (b = 1.07, p = .049), and those with a college degree or higher (all p ≤ .029) reported significantly higher stigma, compared to men, those who did not report Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, and other education categories, respectively. None of the smoking-related characteristics were associated significantly with perceived stigma (all p > .12). Conclusions: Sociodemographic variables (rather than smoking-related characteristics) significantly and uniquely differentiated lung cancer screening-eligible adults' perception of lung cancer stigma. Smoking-related differences in lung cancer stigma may emerge following rather than prior to diagnosis.

Celiac Disease: Common Questions and Answers.

Celiac disease is an immune-mediated, multisystem disorder that affects genetically susceptible individuals who are exposed to gluten-containing grains such as wheat, barley, and rye. The condition can develop at any age. Celiac disease presents with a variety of manifestations such as diarrhea, weight loss, abdominal pain, bloating, malabsorption, and failure to thrive. Most adult patients will present with nonclassic symptoms, including less specific gastrointestinal symptoms or extraintestinal manifestations such as anemia, osteoporosis, transaminitis, and recurrent miscarriage. Immunoglobulin A tissue transglutaminase serologic testing is the recommended initial screening for all age groups. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy with small bowel biopsy is recommended to confirm the diagnosis in most patients, including those with a negative serologic test for whom clinical suspicion of celiac disease persists. Biopsies may be avoided in children with high immunoglobulin A tissue transglutaminase (i.e., 10 times the upper limit of normal or more) and a positive test for immunoglobulin A endomysial antibodies in a second serum sample. Genetic testing for human leukocyte antigen alleles DQ2 or DQ8 may be performed in select cases. A gluten-free diet for life is the primary treatment, and patients may benefit from support groups and education on common and hidden sources of gluten, gluten-free substitutes, food labeling, balanced meal planning, dining out, dining during travel, and avoiding cross-contamination. Patients with celiac disease who do not respond to a gluten-free diet should have the accuracy of the diagnosis confirmed, have their diet reassessed, and be evaluated for coexisting conditions. Patients with refractory celiac disease should be treated by a gastroenterologist.

Beyond Abortion: The Consequences of Overturning Roe.

The upcoming U.S. Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization has the potential to eliminate or severely restrict access to legal abortion care in the United States. We address the impact that the decision could have on abortion access and its consequences beyond abortion care. We posit that an abortion ban would, in effect, mean that anyone who becomes pregnant, including those who continue a pregnancy and give birth to healthy newborns and those with pregnancy complications or adverse pregnancy outcomes will become newly vulnerable to legal surveillance, civil detentions, forced interventions, and criminal prosecution. The harms imposed by banning or severely restricting abortion access will disproportionately affect persons of color and perpetuate structural racism. We caution that focusing on Roe as a decision that only protects ending a pregnancy ignores the protection that the decision also affords people who want to continue their pregnancies. It overlooks the ways in which overturning Roe will curtail fundamental rights for all those who become pregnant and will undermine their status as full persons meriting Constitutional protections. Such a singular focus inevitably obscures the common ground that people across the ideological spectrum might inhabit to ensure the safety, health, humanity, and rights of all people who experience pregnancy.

Poverty, Comorbidity, and Ethnicity: COVID-19 Outcomes in a Safety Net Health System.

Objective: To determine if race-ethnicity is correlated with case-fatality rates among low-income patients hospitalized for COVID-19. Research Design: Observational cohort study using electronic health record data. Patients: All patients assessed for COVID-19 from March 2020 to January 2021 at one safety net health system. Measures: Patient demographic and clinical characteristics, and hospital care processes and outcomes. Results: Among 25,253 patients assessed for COVID-19, 6,357 (25.2%) were COVID-19 positive: 1,480 (23.3%) hospitalized; 334 (22.6%) required intensive care; and 106 (7.3%) died. More Hispanic patients tested positive (51.8%) than non-Hispanic Black (31.4%) and White patients (16.7%, P<.001]. Hospitalized Hispanic patients were younger, more often uninsured, and less likely to have comorbid conditions. Non-Hispanic Black patients had significantly more diabetes, hypertension, obesity, chronic kidney disease, and asthma (P<.05). Non-Hispanic White patients were older and had more cigarette smoking history, COPD, and cancer. Non-Hispanic White patients were more likely to receive intensive care (29.6% vs 21.1% vs 20.8%, P=.007) and more likely to die (12% vs 7.3% vs 3.5%, P<.001) compared with non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic patients, respectively. Length of stay was similar for all groups. In logistic regression models, Medicaid insurance status independently correlated with hospitalization (OR 3.67, P<.001) while only age (OR 1.076, P<.001) and cerebrovascular disease independently correlated with in-hospital mortality (OR 2.887, P=.002). Conclusions: Observed COVID-19 in-hospital mortality rate was lower than most published rates. Age, but not race-ethnicity, was independently correlated with in-hospital mortality. Safety net health systems are foundational in the care of vulnerable patients suffering from COVID-19, including patients from under-represented and low-income groups.

Balancing enhanced contraceptive access with risk of reproductive injustice: A United States comparative case study.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine how peripartum contraceptive care quality improvement efforts address or perpetuate reproductive health injustices. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a comparative case study of inpatient postpartum contraceptive care implementation in 2017 to 2018, using key informant interviews at 11 United States hospitals. After our primary analysis revealed tensions between enhancing access to contraceptive care and patient-centeredness, we conducted the current inductive content analysis guided by 4 questions developed post-hoc: (1) What are healthcare workers' aspirations for contraceptive quality improvement programs? (2) What are healthcare workers' biases regarding peripartum contraceptive care delivery? (3) Do care delivery processes center patients' needs? (4) Do healthcare workers recognize and engage with structural inequities? RESULTS: Seventy-eight key informants (i.e., clinicians, operations staff, administrators) participated. In nine study sites, we observed evidence of interviewees both mitigating and perpetuating reproductive injustice. Many aspired to provide compassionate, patient-centered care, avoid paternalism, and foster patient autonomy. Simultaneously, interviewees demonstrated biases, including implicit subscription to an ideology of stratified reproduction, stereotyping, and "othering." Even when interviewees endorsed goals of patient-centeredness, care delivery processes sometimes prioritized healthcare systems' needs, and patients were not included on quality improvement teams. Many interviewees recognized structural inequities as driving health outcome disparities, yet relied on individual-level solutions like long-acting reversible contraception, and not structural-level interventions, to address them. CONCLUSION: Alongside enthusiasm for delivering compassionate care exist biases, missed opportunities to center patients, and lack of curiosity about the appropriateness of solving structural-level problems with individual-level solutions. IMPLICATIONS: Our findings call for individual and institutional self-reflection, partnership with patients and communities, and other intentional efforts to mitigate potential for harm in initiatives enhancing access to contraceptive care.

Development of a Computer-Tailored Intervention/Decision Aid To Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in Health Systems.

Background Non-compliance with scheduled colonoscopy is common among patients, especially in underserved populations. High no-show and late cancelation rates result in wasted resources, increased costs, and missed opportunities for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Among the barriers to colonoscopy is a lack of knowledge about the benefits, fears, and limited time for patient counseling. Methodology We produced a digital video disc and a website program to enhance awareness about CRC screening and address patient barriers in a population with low screening adherence. Results Patients can be educated via an interactive computer-tailored intervention with both DVD and web versions. It details the benefits and need for CRC screening, different methods of screening, and addresses patient-related barriers. Conclusions Patient education is crucial to increase CRC screening among eligible individuals. Because online engagement is affected by attention, interest, and affect, content should be concise but comprehensive.

Leveraging Administrative Claims to Understand Disparities in Gender Minority Health: Contraceptive Use Patterns Among Transgender and Nonbinary People.

Purpose: Transgender people face disparities in access to reproductive and sexual health services; however, differences in receipt of contraceptive services have not been quantified. We compare contraceptive patterns between cisgender women and trans masculine people in insurance claims databases. Methods: We analyzed 2014-2018 Truven MarketScan data, using diagnostic and procedural codes to identify sex assigned at birth, and existing coding methodology to identify transgender and nonbinary people. We compared contraceptive patterns between cisgender women and trans masculine people aged 15-49 in Medicaid and commercial databases. Results: We identified 4700 people in the commercial and 1628 people in the Medicaid databases as trans masculine. Trans masculine people were prescribed fewer oral contraceptive pills (Medicaid: 17.44%, commercial: 16.62%) compared to cisgender women (Medicaid: 24.96%, commercial: 27.85%), less long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) use (Medicaid: 7.62%, commercial: 7.49% vs. Medicaid: 12.79%, commercial: 8.51%), had more hysterectomies (Medicaid: 5.77%, commercial: 8.45% vs. Medicaid: 2.15%, commercial: 2.48%), and less evidence of any contraception (Medicaid: 34.21%, commercial: 32.28% vs. Medicaid: 46.80%, commercial: 39.81%). Hysterectomies and LARC use varied by insurance type. Conclusion: We found significant differences in contraceptive patterns between trans masculine people and cisgender women. Data suggest potential differences in hysterectomy occurrences by trans masculine people, and long-acting reversible contraceptive use by cisgender women, in Medicaid versus commercial insurance cohorts. Appropriate counseling, insurance coverage, and removal of structural barriers are needed to ensure adequate access to contraception methods for people of all genders-regardless of whether they are being employed for contraception, menstrual management, or gender affirmation.

Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the lung cancer screening health belief scales.

BACKGROUND: Health belief is an important factor affecting lung cancer screening in high-risk population, but the research based on Chinese cultural background is still insufficient. Therefore, we adapted the English version of the Lung Cancer Screening Health Belief Scales (LCSHB) into the Chinese version (LCSHB-C) and examined its psychometric characteristics. METHODS: After obtaining authorization from the original author, the LCSHB-C was adapted based upon Brislin's translation model. Using a variety of community-based recruitment methods, a total of 353 participants were recruited in Fuzhou, Fujian province, China to complete the questionnaires. We combined the classical test theory and item response theory to examine the psychometric properties of the LCSHB-C. RESULTS: The Cronbach's alpha for the four subscales ranged from 0.83 ~ 0.93. The content validity index for the four subscales was ranged from 0.87 ~ 1.0. Confirmatory factor analysis supported each subscale structure model fit well. Rasch analysis results further validated the reliability and validity of the four subscales. The person reliability and separation index of each subscale ranged from 0.77 to 0.87 and 1.83 to 2.63, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The LCSHB-C is a reliable and valid instrument used to measure health beliefs related to lung cancer screening among those high-risk for lung cancer in China, which facilitates the development of lung cancer screening programs and promotes the "three early prevention strategies" of lung cancer (i.e.,early detection, early diagnosis and early treatment).

Stakeholder Research Priorities to Promote Implementation of Shared Decision-Making for Lung Cancer Screening: An American Thoracic Society and Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Statement.

Rationale: Shared decision-making (SDM) for lung cancer screening (LCS) is recommended in guidelines and required by Medicare, yet it is seldom achieved in practice. The best approach for implementing SDM for LCS remains unknown, and the 2021 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force calls for implementation research to increase uptake of SDM for LCS. Objectives: To develop a stakeholder-prioritized research agenda and recommended outcomes to advance implementation of SDM for LCS. Methods: The American Thoracic Society and VA Health Services Research and Development Service convened a multistakeholder committee with expertise in SDM, LCS, patient-centered care, and implementation science. During a virtual State of the Art conference, we reviewed evidence and identified research questions to address barriers to implementing SDM for LCS, as well as outcome constructs, which were refined by writing group members. Our committee (n = 34) then ranked research questions and SDM effectiveness outcomes by perceived importance in an online survey. Results: We present our committee's consensus on three topics important to implementing SDM for LCS: 1) foundational principles for the best practice of SDM for LCS; 2) stakeholder rankings of 22 implementation research questions; and 3) recommended outcomes, including Proctor's implementation outcomes and stakeholder rankings of SDM effectiveness outcomes for hybrid implementation-effectiveness studies. Our committee ranked questions that apply innovative implementation approaches to relieve primary care providers of the sole responsibility of SDM for LCS as highest priority. We rated effectiveness constructs that capture the patient experience of SDM as most important. Conclusions: This statement offers a stakeholder-prioritized research agenda and outcomes to advance implementation of SDM for LCS.

Perceptions of Clinical Trial Participation in African American Cancer Survivors and Caregivers.

PURPOSE: To explore the perceptions of African American survivors and caregivers about participation in clinical trials. PARTICIPANTS & SETTING: 13 participants were enrolled and participated in one of the focus groups, and 11 participated in two focus groups. METHODOLOGIC APPROACH: A qualitative descriptive study using a community-based participatory research approach. Focus groups guided by Freire's dialogic model explored the perceptions of African American patients with cancer about participation in clinical trials. Focus groups were audio recorded and transcribed. FINDINGS: The analysis identified three main themes. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: The under- representation of African American patients in clinical trials contributes to racial health disparity by negatively affecting health outcomes and quality of care delivered to this population. Oncology nurses are at the forefront of cancer care and in the best position to advocate for individuals with cancer, particularly those who face health inequalities. Findings from this study guided the recommendations.